Buying a
Franchise - part 2
- by
Leith
Oliver
ESTABLISHING THE
ANNUAL RETURN
The first of these, the annual
dollar return figure, is the figure for Net Profit
Before Interest & Tax (NPBIT). Note that the
interest cost is excluded because it relates to the
borrowing needs of the owner – not the business.
This figure will be provided by the
seller either from past trading records or from budgets
of future trading figures (in the case of new start-up
franchise businesses, actual figures may be provided
from the trading histories of existing franchises or a
pilot operation). It is up to the buyer to satisfy
themselves that the expected future profits are reliably
represented in the valuation process.
The NPBIT figure represents Total
Sales Income minus Total Costs. In most cases, the
business costs are easily identified and future
predictions can be checked for validity with some
certainty. Note that a reasonable salary for the
owner/manager must be included as one of the oper
costs (not all businesses show this).
The Total Sales Income, however, is
a different story. Many complex factors influence the
future sales revenue of any business. Changes in the
economy, increased competition, new regulations and
shifting markets, along with the unknown performance of
a new owner, all mean that sales predictions suffer from
a high degree of uncertainty (and much more with an
independent business than a franchise). For this reason,
it becomes the buyer's responsibility to make their own
forecast of future sales, using the seller's figures as
a starting point only, and then moderating those to
arrive at a conservative prediction.
Note, however, that when you are
dealing with a reputable and well-established franchise,
they will be basing their projections on a substantial
amount of data, and will often already be providing
cautious figures. Beware of revising these down again to
the point where an obviously sound proposition begins to
look unprofitable!
When the buyer is satisfied that
the sales and cost figures are realistic, the NPBIT can
be calculated for use in the next process.
ESTABLISHING THE REQUIRED RATE OF
RETURN
The Required Rate of Return (RRR)
is tied to one main business factor – risk. This
marriage between RRR and risk is all around us in the
commercial world. An investment in Government Bonds
gives low interest because the commercial risk is low.
Placing your money in an investment account with the
local Savings Bank pays a little more because the risk
has increased slightly. In contrast, investing on the
stock market carries much higher risk and therefore
investors expect much higher rates of return. Credit
card companies give you an unsecured loan each time you
use your card, and consider the risk to be high enough
to warrant the current interest charge of around 20%.
The question is: "What rate
reflects the risk of investing in a small business?" In
this case, the RRR must take account of two risk
factors: i) the financial market rate for an unsecured
small business investment, and ii) the unique risk
attached to a particular purchase situation.
A
quick check with finance brokers suggests that the
current market rate for small business investment risk
is about 33%. Add to this an allowance for unique risk
factors (eg. short trading history, lack of reliable
figures, seasonal business, aggressive competition, etc)
and you could easily have a RRR on the purchase of 40%
or more.
Alternatively, the risk might be
reduced by circumstances (eg. the vendor leaving money
in the business or remaining associated with it, the
presence of some unique competitive advantage, forward
contracts assuring future sales revenues, etc.). In this
case the RRR may reduce to somewhere below 30%.
Whatever factors are present, the
point is that the buyer must take responsibility for
establishing a RRR that they believe compensates them
for the business risk they are taking.
AN EXAMPLE
Last year I was asked by a
prospective purchaser to help in valuing a business that
distributes machine parts to the crop harvesting
industry. The business was being offered for sale as
follows:
Sales $200,000pa
Price:
Vehicles and
Other Plant $30,000
Goodwill $25,000
Stock $65,000
Total $120,000
After analysing the trading
accounts for the past three years, we established that
the NPBIT had been reliable and consistent at about
$30,000 per year. Independent valuations on the assets
verified the value of the plant at $30,000 and stock at
$65,000. The seller was prepared to leave some money in
the business and would also remain associated with the
business as a supplier. These factors acted to reduce
the risk but were more than offset by another concern.
The crop harvesting industry is very dynamic and
unpredictable. Its fortunes are governed by weather, the
volume of growing contracts from the food processing
industry, and fluctuating market prices for produce.
Because of the variability and riskiness of the industry
we decided that an RRR of 35% was an appropriate
reflection of the purchase risk.
The amount my client was willing to
offer for the business could now be established using
the equation introduced earlier:
The Investment
=
The Return ÷ RRR
=
$30,000 ÷ 35%
=
$85,714
With reference to the original
asking price of $120,000, my client's eventual offer of
$86,000 was in fact saying "given the riskiness of the
venture there is not enough net profit to generate a
goodwill figure, and there is probably too much stock
being carried relative to the trading performance of the
business."
Note that if we had used another
RRR the result would have been different. A 30% RRR, for
example, would have given the following result:
Investment
=
$30,000 ÷ 30%
=
$100,000
The maximum price the buyer would
pay with a RRR of 30% now has room for $5,000 of
goodwill.
FIVE STEP PROCESS
The valuation process for a
purchaser can thus be summarised as follows:
1. Establish a reliable estimate of
the future sales.
2. Forecast the costs and expenses.
3. Calculate the resulting forecast
of net profit before interest and tax.
4. Establish the required rate of
return.
5. Calculate the value of the
business by using the equation above to capitalise the
expected future NPBIT.
A
valuation that results in a figure less than the
tangible asset value indicates operational inefficiency
in the existing business, and eliminates any value for
goodwill or other intangible assets. Conversely, if the
valuation results in a figure that is higher than the
tangible asset value, then the extra establishes the
value of the intangible assets.
PAGE
1
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
|